Call us: (203) 272-3600

Comparing Short-Term and Long-Term Radon Testing

I’ll be honest—radon testing wasn’t something I thought much about until I became a homeowner. But once I learned that radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S., I couldn’t ignore it anymore, especially not with young kids at home.

Radon is invisible. You can’t smell it, you can’t see it, and you won’t feel a thing. That’s what makes it so dangerous—and why radon testing is something I now take very seriously. So, let me help with that. I’ve used both short-term and long-term radon tests, and there are real differences. Choosing the right radon test depends on your timeline, your goals, and your personal comfort level. I’ll make radon simple by explaining:

  • The invisible threat lurking in your home
  • Two ways to test: what you should know
  • Short-term radon testing: Quick, but limited
  • Long-term radon testing: Getting the full picture
  • Which radon test should you choose?
  • What happens after the results come in?

If you're overwhelmed, don’t worry—I’ve felt that way, too, at first. So, let’s take it step-by-step to give you a better understanding of radon and how to test for it. 

The Invisible Threat Lurking in Your Home

First, let’s talk about what radon actually is. Radon is a colorless, odorless, radioactive gas that forms when uranium in soil and rock breaks down. It seeps into homes through cracks in the foundation, gaps around pipes, sump pumps, and even through well water.

I didn’t know any of that until I had my home tested. But once I understood that long-term radon exposure can significantly increase your risk of lung cancer, I knew I couldn’t just ignore the possibility.

And here’s the scary part: radon levels can vary from house to house—even in the same neighborhood. Your next-door neighbor could be fine while your basement is quietly accumulating dangerous levels. That’s why you need radon testing.

Two Ways to Test: What You Should Know

When it comes to radon testing, there are two main methods: short-term and long-term. Radon levels are measured in picocuries per liter (pCi/L). According to the EPA, any reading at or above 4.0 pCi/L is considered actionable. But that number doesn’t mean much unless you have accurate, reliable data—and that’s where choosing the right test really matters.

Short-Term Radon Testing: Quick, but Limited

I started with a short-term test. Here’s what I learned:

  • Duration: Typically runs for 2–7 days
  • Devices: Charcoal canisters, electret ion chambers, or digital radon detectors
  • Best for: Getting quick results, especially during home sales or early screening

Pros:

  • Fast turnaround
  • Affordable and easy to find at most hardware stores
  • Simple setup—no pro needed

Cons:

  • Readings can swing wildly depending on windows, weather, or even where you place the test
  • Doesn’t reflect long-term exposure
  • May give a false sense of security (or panic)

I used a charcoal test kit for my first round. It was easy—I followed the instructions, mailed it in, and got results within a week. But the number I got left me wondering, is this really accurate?

Long-Term Radon Testing: Getting the Full Picture

So, I followed up with a long-term test. And honestly? I’m so glad I did. Let me introduce you to the basics:

  • Duration: Runs for 90 days to one full year
  • Devices: Alpha track detectors or continuous digital monitors
  • Best for: Understanding year-round averages and confirming borderline results

Pros:

  • Far more reliable
  • Accounts for daily and seasonal fluctuations
  • Gives a more complete picture of actual risk

Cons:

  • Takes longer
  • Slightly more expensive
  • Requires patience (which, I admit, is not my strong suit)

But here’s the thing (and I think you’ll agree with me, here): when it comes to my family’s health, I’d rather wait a few months and know for sure than make assumptions based on a quick reading.

Which Radon Test Should You Choose?

I like to think of short-term tests as a snapshot. But long-term tests? They give you a closer look at real conditions over time. Here’s how I think about testing now:

  • If you’re buying or selling a home, use a short-term test. It’s fast, easy, and often required.
  • If this is your first test ever, start with short-term. But don’t stop there if your numbers are close to the EPA’s 4.0 threshold.
  • If you want peace of mind, long-term is the way to go. Especially if you live in a radon-prone area or spend a lot of time in the basement.
  • If your short-term test showed borderline or fluctuating levels, follow up with a long-term test to be sure.

What Happens After the Results Come In?

Here’s where a lot of people freeze up. You get your results—then what? I’ll put it simply here:

  • Below 2.0 pCi/L? You’re probably in the clear. No further action needed for now.
  • Between 2.0 and 4.0 pCi/L? This is the gray zone. Consider running a long-term test or talking to a mitigation expert.
  • Above 4.0 pCi/L? Don’t panic—but certainly act. Schedule a consultation with a certified radon mitigation specialist.

That’s exactly what I did. I called someone out to walk me through my options, and we installed a mitigation system that pulls the radon out from beneath the house before it ever reaches the living space. It wasn’t even that disruptive—and now, my numbers are consistently low.

Conclusion

There’s a lot we can’t control in life. But testing for radon? That’s something we can do—quickly, affordably, and with real peace of mind at the end of it. Whether you go with short-term or long-term radon testing, please take that first step. You don’t need to be a scientist or an expert. You just need to care enough to do it. I’ll tell you this: knowing your radon levels—really knowing—is one of the smartest things you can do as a homeowner. Your health and your safety are well worth it.